Aggregate observations from across the core sessions and optional studio into a shared, inspectable wall. The tool makes collective evidence visible — you can see where the whole room landed, which claims have evidence, and which ones rest only on impression.
Live preview · launch for the interactive version
Each observation lands as a card with its source tool, a category tag, and the claim. As cards accumulate, the distribution of tags — how many “defaults,” how many “failures” — becomes visible at a glance.
Every card requires a category before it lands: default, failure, assumption, pattern, or question. Choosing the category forces a claim about what kind of observation this is — not just what you noticed.
The same default appearing on three cards from different tools is evidence. One card with the same default is an observation. The wall makes that distinction legible by showing all the cards at once.
Add your observations from each session. Name what you have evidence for — and what you only suspect.
When adding an observation, name the tool and session it came from. “I noticed” is weaker than “in Temporal Telephone, step 4 showed…”
Tag each observation with a category: default, failure, assumption, pattern, or question. Vague tags make aggregation harder.
After the wall is populated: which defaults appear across multiple tools? Which assumptions are consistent? Which ones vary?
For each claim: can you point to a specific observation on the wall? If not, it’s still an impression. Name the difference.