Session 3 · Video

Session 3 Feedback

Thanks for investigating video with us. This takes about four minutes.

Every question is optional, and you can leave your name blank. Responses are read only by facilitators. We will not quote or identify you publicly from this feedback form without separate permission. Nothing is stored in your browser; answers leave this page only when you press send.

Response sent — thank you.

This helps shape the optional Studio / Showcase and future Learning Machines sessions. The Session 3 page has everything we touched today.

About you

Name or display name
Optional — leave blank to stay anonymous.
How did you attend or participate?
Choose every mode that applies. Watching or listening is a full participation route.

What happened in Session 3

Which parts made something click or gave you a useful question?
Choose any that apply.
For each idea, where are you now?
Clearer than beforeAbout the sameMore tangled than beforeI did not encounter this
Video coherence concerns relationships staying consistent across time
A stable reference may improve consistency but does not guarantee it
Coherence Animator is a teaching analogy, not a literal video-model architecture
Animation ideas such as timing, keyframes, and layers can guide observation without proving how a model works
Smooth video is not evidence that an event happened
What did Coherence Animator or the animation discussion help you notice — and what is still fuzzy?
A short observation or unresolved question is enough. You can also say what the activity did not demonstrate.

Guest spotlight

What idea or question from Dr. Emily Thomforde's “Axiology of Mystery” talk stayed with you?

Format and access

Could you participate in the way you wanted?
Anything facilitators should know about?
Tool friction, pacing, access, recording, likeness, consent, or anything else that affected participation.

What comes next

Which follow-up would you actually use?
Would you join an August Learning Machines Studio / Showcase?
Which Saturday works better for the optional Studio / Showcase?
What might you bring, develop, or need in order to participate?
A tool, experiment, classroom activity, creative artifact, critique, question, support need, or rough idea.

Last word

What should we keep, change, or carry into the next version?
Would you recommend Learning Machines to a colleague or friend?

Prefer a plain form? Open the Google Form version — same questions, same place.